I have to create an online application for a cemetery, just like this one:
http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=5676017d60ac44729e9cedf66709ff5e
Like in the example, in my case some tombs (only 3!) have more than one people burried, so there is an one-to-many relationship between the tombs and the occupants. So I’ve attached to the 400 polygons representing the tombs, the excel table containing all the people burried (403) using Make Query Table. And now I have 403 polygons, one for each occupant. I’ve exported the table into a shapefile because I had to save the table.
But is this the right way? If I put all these polygons into the online application, I guess that when I click on a tomb with two occupants, it will show me only one name, depending which one is above. And I won’t be happy with that.
Is creating a relationship class between the two tables more effective? I have’n done so far any online application or online map.
أكثر...
http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=5676017d60ac44729e9cedf66709ff5e
Like in the example, in my case some tombs (only 3!) have more than one people burried, so there is an one-to-many relationship between the tombs and the occupants. So I’ve attached to the 400 polygons representing the tombs, the excel table containing all the people burried (403) using Make Query Table. And now I have 403 polygons, one for each occupant. I’ve exported the table into a shapefile because I had to save the table.
But is this the right way? If I put all these polygons into the online application, I guess that when I click on a tomb with two occupants, it will show me only one name, depending which one is above. And I won’t be happy with that.
Is creating a relationship class between the two tables more effective? I have’n done so far any online application or online map.
أكثر...