It seems like it would help a great deal to store as much of the image as possible on the GPU for panning and zooming etc.
We deal with a lot of very large images. Many range from 8 gigs to hundreds of gigs in size. At home I've got a 40" 4k monitor and a GTX Titan with 12 gigs of video memory it performs amazingly well for everything I throw at it. It also looks great when viewing imagery. Is that setup overkill for GIS image processing work?
Would QGIS, ArcMap and PCI Geomatics be able to take advantage of abundant graphics memory when dealing with multi gigabyte images and image mosaics in the range of hundreds of gigs?
What GIS applications would see the most benefit from an abundance of GPU memory when dealing with large images?
أكثر...
We deal with a lot of very large images. Many range from 8 gigs to hundreds of gigs in size. At home I've got a 40" 4k monitor and a GTX Titan with 12 gigs of video memory it performs amazingly well for everything I throw at it. It also looks great when viewing imagery. Is that setup overkill for GIS image processing work?
Would QGIS, ArcMap and PCI Geomatics be able to take advantage of abundant graphics memory when dealing with multi gigabyte images and image mosaics in the range of hundreds of gigs?
What GIS applications would see the most benefit from an abundance of GPU memory when dealing with large images?
أكثر...