I have quite a bit of data that I am caching from UTM to Web Mercator. This is fine, but I have another process that automatically creates map book pdfs. These map books have been setup to read the data from the enterprise geodatabase, reproject them on the fly to Web Mercator, and export the maps to pdf.
I'm making a lot of these, and it is slow. Plus, I'm not sure why they are being reprojected to Web Mercator instead of using UTM. If I switch to UTM, would it be faster to reproject the raster from the WMS/Mapserver to UTM, or use the source vector data and not have to reproject?
I can't give you a screenshot but, let's imagine I'm using something roughly equivalent to OpenStreetmap data http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12791038#map=15/35.0899/-92.4643&layers=H . I probably have 50 layers in my MXD. Some layers have hundreds of thousands to millions of rows. Obviously, not all in view. The mapbooks are zoomed into a streetview so they are pretty detailed and cover up to 30 square miles so they have 30-90 pages each.
I'm using the ArcGIS (with ArcGIS Server) stack, but am open to other (more efficient) options if available.
أكثر...
I'm making a lot of these, and it is slow. Plus, I'm not sure why they are being reprojected to Web Mercator instead of using UTM. If I switch to UTM, would it be faster to reproject the raster from the WMS/Mapserver to UTM, or use the source vector data and not have to reproject?
I can't give you a screenshot but, let's imagine I'm using something roughly equivalent to OpenStreetmap data http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12791038#map=15/35.0899/-92.4643&layers=H . I probably have 50 layers in my MXD. Some layers have hundreds of thousands to millions of rows. Obviously, not all in view. The mapbooks are zoomed into a streetview so they are pretty detailed and cover up to 30 square miles so they have 30-90 pages each.
I'm using the ArcGIS (with ArcGIS Server) stack, but am open to other (more efficient) options if available.
أكثر...