I have a strong feeling that database design and normalisation often comes in second hand when dealing with spatial data.
With software costing a fortune and databases with over 100 fields tables I have to ask:
Is there good reasons for taking other considerations than normalisation when designing a spatial database?
I guess people will ask for examples, but that I can not give here, so my question is maybe more aimed for those who means that 100 fields is no problem and easier to maintain than a proper normalized design.
What are the arguments?
أكثر...
With software costing a fortune and databases with over 100 fields tables I have to ask:
Is there good reasons for taking other considerations than normalisation when designing a spatial database?
I guess people will ask for examples, but that I can not give here, so my question is maybe more aimed for those who means that 100 fields is no problem and easier to maintain than a proper normalized design.
What are the arguments?
أكثر...